Monday, December 1, 2014

Sectionalism and the Political Parties

Sectionalism 

Party

Description
Election of 1860
Democrats

- 1830s – rise in the support for economic and political opportunities for white males
-       limited government that creates economic and political opportunities
-       Jackson: “the planter, the farmer, the mechanic, the laborer all know thir success depends on their own industry and economy”
-       Opposed national banks and corporations
-       Attracted 
Small merchants/working class in Northeast
Southern planters suspicious of industrial growth
Westerners (usually from the South) favoring agrarian economy and opposing powerful economic institutions in their region
-       Franklin Pierce , Stephen Douglas

“Northern Dem” Candidate: Douglas

Southern Dem Candidate: Breckinridge

Whigs

-   Established in 1834; mostly gone by 1856
-   Promoted expansion of the federal government, encouraging industrial and commercial development; creating an interwoven and consolidated national economy
-   Favored national banks and corporations
-   Tended to be wealthier, more aristocratic, more commercially ambitious than Democrats
-   Attracted 
Northeastern merchants/ manufacturers 
wealthy Southern planters supporting commercial development and strengthening ties with the North (1830s)
ambitious Western farmers and commercial class (usually from the Northeast) that supported internal improvement and rapid economic progress
-   Henry Clay, Zachary Taylor
-   Divided / destroyed by the KA-NE Act (1854)

“Constitutional Union Party” Candidate: Bell 

– supports union (unity), silent on slavery
Republicans
-   established in 1854 by Anti-NE Democrats and Whigs
-   Anti-slavery and concerned about popular sovereignty
-   Tried to attract Northern interest groups; claimed South was blocking the North’s economic aspirations
-   Took a traditionally Whig platform: high tariff, Pacific railroad with federal financing
Candidate: Lincoln

On Slavery:  
- believed slavery was morally wrong, but was not an abolitionist, because he could not envision an easy alternative to slavery where it existed
- did not believe that African Americans were prepared (and maybe never would be) to live on equal terms with whites
- accepted the prevailing view that blacks were inferior (politically and socially) to whites, but believed they were entitled to natural human rights set forth by the Constitution – life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
- wanted to stop the spread of slavery; believed that if they stopped the spread, it would die out eventually
- won with majority of electoral college, but only 2/5 of the popular vote

Free-Soil (A Party and a Perspective in the North)
-   became a party in 1848, when opponents of slavery were looking for a candidate who would take a stance on slavery
-   Not a moral stance on slavery, but became the prevalent Northern perspective
-   Believed in the right of all Americans to own property, control their own labor, and have opportunities for economic advancement
-   Saw slavery as a closed, aristocratically controlled labor system
-   Saw northern industry as an open, capitalistic, individualistic, progressive system

Pro-Slavery (Solidifying the Southern Way of Life)
-   Calhoun: the South should stop apologizing for  slavery as a necessary evil and defend it as a positive good
-   Slavery is the basis for the South’s way of life and economy; the South’s economy was key to American economic success
-   South  protected the welfare of its workers (unlike the North with its immigrant labor force)



The Underground Railroad
-      
       An informal chain of “stations” (anti-slavery homes) through which “passengers” (runaway slaves) were helped by “conductors” (usually white and black abolitionists) from slave states to Canada (and the North in general)
-       Harriet Tubman – famous conductor; runaway slave from Maryland – 19 trips bringing more than 300 slaves out of the South
o   Nicknamed “Moses” who led his people out of Eqypt
-       Later the reach of the Underground Railroad was greatly exaggerated, but its importance is huge, particularly as the South demanded more stringent slave laws



No comments:

Post a Comment